Skip to main content

Così fan tutte = Shakespearean problem play?

Così fan tutte has always been the problem child of the Da Ponte operas. Critical favor has elided it in favor of Figaro and Giovanni, it's more illustrious siblings. This is partly because Così's tone (or message -- or moral -- etc.) has been so difficult to pin down. This is a story of two young couples who have their sense of self and beliefs in love systematically dismantled. But the ending is happy, with all being forgiven and a double marriage!



In its discrepancy in tone, in the sheer impossibility of glossing over the secret trauma of its subject, I am sharply reminded of the Shakespearean "problem plays," which are similarly tragicomic, queasily on the edge between the serious and the comic. Like Così, the problem plays have the syntax and structure of comedy, if not the diction.

But there is an essential difference between Shakespeare and Mozart, which is that, in drama, it is almost impossible to actually juxtapose these antipodes. Music is different, because the quality of the music can run in parallel to the quality of the story, words, and drama. Juxtaposition can and does happen; is not the Duke's jaunty melody in Rigoletto deeply ironic, the sadness of Violetta counterpointed by Verdi's persistent waltz beat?

I will never forget a Boston Lyric Opera production of Così fan tutte that I was lucky to see years ago. Specifically, the finale: the four young leads penned in on the stage, looking lost and almost terrified, while Mozart's music practically seared with beauty.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

February, March, April reading

Crystallography , Christian Bok Glass, Irony, and God , Anne Carson The Dolphin  and Day by Day  (selections), Robert Lowell Dolls , Claire Millikin Burying the Mountain , Shangyang Fang In the Language of My Captor , Shane McCrae frank: sonnets , Diane Seuss All the Flowers Kneeling , Paul Tran Border-Crosser with a Lamborghini Dream , Juan Felipe Herrera Ajax , Sophocles Trojan Women , Euripides The Bacchae , Euripides (from 2021; listed now) Iphigenia in Aulis , Euripides (from 2021; listed now) Orestes , Euripides Alceste , Euripides Macbeth , Shakespeare Coriolanus , Shakespeare (from 2021; listed now) Pericles , Shakespeare (from 2021; listed now)

greatness

The NY Times has run an excellent article on greatness in poetry. It's always interesting to read NY Times on poetry -- there was a fascinating one about Jorie Graham's entrance to Harvard (Valhalla?) -- because NY Times believes in poetry, but is egoistic enough to be upset when it's confronted with something it doesn't understand. That's a very useful quality, because it respectfully/hesitantly calls a pear a pear, instead of some helium-filled blather. Maybe because of it, the article anointed only one great post-Eliot poet: Elizabeth Bishop. I'm pleased and agree. (There was some noise about Ashbery, but we'll see what happens 20 years after he's dead, which means in roughly 10 years. I mean, 21.) The criterion that article settled on for greatness is: “demonstrating the qualities that make poetry seem interesting and worthwhile to such a degree that subsequent practitioners of the art form have found her work a more useful resource than the work